Meeting Effectiveness Pulse — Candour Coaching
Two minutes of candour that will make every meeting better. Six questions, anonymous, acted on.
|
|
Candour Coaching
Performance Partner
|
|
|
Meeting Effectiveness Pulse
Two minutes of candour.
Better meetings for everyone.
|
|
The research is blunt: the person leading a meeting is the least reliable judge of whether it worked. The only way to know is to ask the room.
So we're asking. Your answers are anonymous. We'll report the themes back to everyone, change what needs changing, and measure again. If the data doesn't move, we haven't finished.
Rate each statement from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
|
|
Complete within two hours, while it's still fresh.
|
|
4. This meeting was a good use of my time.
|
| 1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
| Strongly disagree → Strongly agree |
|
|
|
5. I left this meeting knowing exactly what happens next, who owns it, and by when.
|
| 1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
| Strongly disagree → Strongly agree |
|
|
|
6. During this meeting, I felt safe to disagree or voice a concern.
|
| 1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
| Strongly disagree → Strongly agree |
|
|
|
One last thing (optional): What one change would most improve these meetings?
Answer it inside the survey — this is where the real gold usually sits.
|
|
Anonymous · Two minutes · Themes reported back to all
|
Candour Coaching
Michael Marshall · Director
candourcoaching.com · Sydney, Australia
|
|
“The meeting isn’t about whether the leader felt it had value — it’s about whether the room did.”
|
|
|
